HarborvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 29 635 | 35 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | +1 771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 771 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with