DockerRegistryvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 666 | 35 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +1 771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry and RustFS score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 771 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with