Harborvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 29 641 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with