HarborvsRoborock Local Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | Roborock Local Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #3 of 5 in Smart Home |
| GitHub stars | 29 641 | 1 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →Roborock Local Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with