Roborock Local ServervsSonatype Nexus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | Sonatype Nexus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 205 | 2 691 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 30 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Sonatype Nexus scores 64/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonatype Nexus is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
Sonatype Nexus is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →Sonatype Nexus details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep Sonatype Nexus, compare it with