HarborvsLAN-Orangutan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | LAN-Orangutan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 29 640 | 1 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +186 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+186 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →LAN-Orangutan details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep LAN-Orangutan, compare it with