HarborvsADAMANT IPFS Node
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | ADAMANT IPFS Node | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 29 635 | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →ADAMANT IPFS Node details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep ADAMANT IPFS Node, compare it with