Harborvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 643 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →hass-configurator details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with