HarakavsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Haraka scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Haraka is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Haraka is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with