Mail-in-a-BoxvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 15 450 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Mail-in-a-Box.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with