hankovsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hanko | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 052 | 30 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +713 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 79 |
| Latest release | backend/v3.1.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 68/100 for hanko, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hanko.
If you want the quickest setup, hanko is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+713 stars in 30 days).
hanko details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep hanko, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with