InfisicalvsKong Gateway
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | Kong Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 30 112 | 44 318 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +713 | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, Kong Gateway is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+713 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →Kong Gateway details →