hadoopvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hadoop | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
hadoop scores 76/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Print Farm Manager ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hadoop.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.
hadoop is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
hadoop details →Print Farm Manager details →