growthbookvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 545 | 89 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +120 | +2 388 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 17 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
If you want the quickest setup, growthbook is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).
growthbook details →World Monitor details →