growthbookvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 8 544 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +123 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
growthbook ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
growthbook is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).
growthbook details →Octoprint details →