grok-reg-toolvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grok-reg-tool | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 26 in Automation | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 217 | 95 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.1.2 · 8 Jun 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 38/100 for grok-reg-tool, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grok-reg-tool.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).
grok-reg-tool details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep grok-reg-tool, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with