grocyvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grocy | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Home Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 9 626 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Blade | Python |
Which one should you pick?
grocy scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
grocy ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, grocy is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
grocy is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
grocy details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep grocy, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with