Gristvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 012 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Grist is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with