Gristvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 016 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; worklenz needs more configuration.
Grist details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with