GristvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 12 014 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Grist is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with