GristvsQloApps
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | QloApps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 12 012 | 14 451 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
Grist is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →QloApps details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep QloApps, compare it with