GristvsPterodactyl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | Pterodactyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #4 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 12 017 | 9 439 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +158 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Grist and Pterodactyl score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
Grist details →Pterodactyl details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep Pterodactyl, compare it with