graphitivssupermemory
Two self-hosted Zep alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| graphiti | supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in RAG | #19 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 32 308 | 31 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 196 | +599 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.31.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | server-v0.0.9 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
graphiti scores 78/100 against 73/100 for supermemory, so it is the safer default.
graphiti ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for supermemory.
If you want the quickest setup, supermemory is easier to run; graphiti needs more configuration.
graphiti details →supermemory details → All Zep alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep graphiti, compare it with
Keep supermemory, compare it with