GraphHoppervsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GraphHopper | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Navigation | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 6 748 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 18 |
| Latest release | 11.1 · 29 Sept 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
GraphHopper scores 70/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for GraphHopper.
If you want the quickest setup, GraphHopper is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
GraphHopper is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
GraphHopper details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep GraphHopper, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with