grafanavstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grafana | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 77 573 | 24 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +699 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 | 11 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 83/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
grafana details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep grafana, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with