gpt-researchervsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 30 351 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +739 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
gpt-researcher ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, gpt-researcher is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+739 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with