gpt-researchervsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 339 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +727 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
gpt-researcher ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+727 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with