gpt-researchervsvanilla-cookbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | vanilla-cookbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 357 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +745 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 13 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v1.6.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 46/100 for vanilla-cookbook, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, vanilla-cookbook is easier to run; gpt-researcher needs more configuration.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+745 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →vanilla-cookbook details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep vanilla-cookbook, compare it with