GotenbergvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 13 472 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +316 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with