Gotenbergvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 13 470 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +314 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+314 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with