GopeedvsQuasarr
Two self-hosted Download Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gopeed | Quasarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 45 in Download Management | #34 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 27 227 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +735 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.9.3 · 18 Mar 2026 | v.4.7.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gopeed scores 80/100 against 45/100 for Quasarr, so it is the safer default.
Quasarr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Gopeed.
If you want the quickest setup, Gopeed is easier to run; Quasarr needs more configuration.
Gopeed is growing faster right now (+735 stars in 30 days).
Gopeed details →Quasarr details →All Download Management projects →