google-webfonts-helpervsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| google-webfonts-helper | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Web Development | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 073 | 41 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +2 819 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.7.2 · 1 Oct 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 64/100 for google-webfonts-helper, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for google-webfonts-helper.
If you want the quickest setup, google-webfonts-helper is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 819 stars in 30 days).
google-webfonts-helper details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep google-webfonts-helper, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with