GogsvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 | 2 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; WebCodex needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →WebCodex details →