GogsvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →