GogsvsProxMenux
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | ProxMenux | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 | 3 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 5 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; ProxMenux needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →ProxMenux details →