GogsvsProliferate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Proliferate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #52 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 47 909 | 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | proliferate-v0.4.29 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 49/100 for Proliferate, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Proliferate.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Proliferate needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Proliferate details →