GogsvsopenITCOCKPIT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | openITCOCKPIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #6 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 | 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | openITCOCKPIT-5.9.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 54/100 for openITCOCKPIT, so it is the safer default.
openITCOCKPIT ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; openITCOCKPIT needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →openITCOCKPIT details →