God's Eye ViewvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| God's Eye View | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 61 067 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
God's Eye View scores 83/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for God's Eye View.
If you want the quickest setup, God's Eye View is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
God's Eye View is growing faster right now (+2 511 stars in 30 days).
God's Eye View details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep God's Eye View, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with