GoAccessvsTinystatus
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GoAccess | Tinystatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 093 | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +145 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
GoAccess scores 75/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.
GoAccess is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).
GoAccess details →Tinystatus details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep GoAccess, compare it with
Keep Tinystatus, compare it with