GoAccessvsShinken
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GoAccess | Shinken | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #17 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 094 | 1 135 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
GoAccess scores 75/100 against 53/100 for Shinken, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, GoAccess is easier to run; Shinken needs more configuration.
GoAccess is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
GoAccess details →Shinken details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep GoAccess, compare it with
Keep Shinken, compare it with