go2rtcvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 14 522 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
go2rtc ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with