go2rtcvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 519 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with