go2rtcvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
go2rtc ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Print Farm Manager needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Print Farm Manager details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Print Farm Manager, compare it with