go2rtcvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 14 522 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with