go2rtcvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 520 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
go2rtc details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with