copypartyvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with