glusterfsvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with