glusterfsvsSonatype Nexus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Sonatype Nexus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 2 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 30 |
| Latest release | — | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Sonatype Nexus scores 64/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonatype Nexus is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
glusterfs details →Sonatype Nexus details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Sonatype Nexus, compare it with