glusterfsvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 38 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with