GitnessvsRemoteTerm for MeshCore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gitness | RemoteTerm for MeshCore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gitness scores 80/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.
RemoteTerm for MeshCore ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gitness.
If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.
Gitness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).
Gitness details →RemoteTerm for MeshCore details →